Subject: Re: xsl:key and document()
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:50:08 GMT
|
> storing the base doc tree in a variable seems a bit hack-y and
> inefficient.
why should it be inefficient? (You are not storing the whole tree in the
variable, just the root node)
Getting back to that root node is a rather different problem from the
one that Jeni was refering to which is getting the URI of that node.
XSLT specifies that every node has a URI (even if it is somewhat
artificial for constructed documents) it just doesn't let you know what
that URI is.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
Robert Goheen - Mon, 8 Jan 2001 20:47:41 -0500 (EST)
Robert Goheen - Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:25:03 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:50:54 -0500 (EST) <=
|
|
Cart
