Subject: Re: Beware the count method with Muenchian grouping (was: Testing by counting or positional predicate)
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:30:33 +0000
|
Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > I did some time runs with MSXML 3.0 and Saxon 6.0.2 (with Sun JDK
> > 1.3) on Windows NT 4.0 Workstation with Sp5.
> [snip]
>
> Wow - thanks very much for such a detailed test and report. It's very
> interesting to see the differences between the processors (BTW Saxon
> 6.1's out now - I don't know how much difference that would have
> made), which does seem to rest on the generate-id() implementation.
> Mike's mentioned on the Saxon list that he's planning to address that,
> so perhaps things will change there.
>
Likewise "Wow"!
Always more interesting to learn something unexpected, and those results
certainly show the dangers of generalising from anecdotal evidence, even
when it's my own...
Thanks for taking the trouble to report and explain your case so well.
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: Beware the count method with Muenchian grouping (was: Testing by counting or positional predicate), (continued)
- Daniel Bowen - Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:32:52 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:26:55 -0500 (EST)
- Daniel Bowen - Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:46:30 -0500 (EST)
- Jeni Tennison - Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:46:34 -0500 (EST)
- Francis Norton - Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:32:23 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:16:50 -0500 (EST)
- Daniel Bowen - Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:54:46 -0500 (EST)
- Francis Norton - Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:38:47 -0500 (EST)
- Francis Norton - Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:53:39 -0500 (EST)
|
|