> The meaning of my message is not to use binary cut at all -- it is
> meaningless to optimise a problem one knows is eliminated...

agreed! All I meant was to ask if the original had been coded
in a tail recursive manner (as the original code wasn't posted until
this morning (unless i missed it).


> Probably other people will provide information about other popular XSLT
> processors.

In particular, I think most of the authors of these systems probably
keep half an eye on this list..

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list