Paul Tchistopolskii wrote:
> I think,  the real story is that at some point Mike realized that XT is not 
> good enough for him.

Correct.

> Why this simple situation has to be reflected in such 
> a strange discussion I don't understand.

Someone mentioned that XT had no support. I pointed out that there is some
support -- 4xt.org. But then I added that 4xt.org's support for the
XT-using community is unfocused and there has not been any progress in the
areas where XT is, IMHO, most in need of improvement. I mentioned some of
these areas, and I expressed disappointment in the slow pace of XT
development since it was abandoned by James Clark almost a year ago.
What's so hard to understand? :)

   - Mike
____________________________________________________________________
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at         My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA           http://www.skew.org/xml/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list