Subject: RE: XSL vs. XSLT and processors vs. parsers
From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:27:38 +0100
|
Who are you calling English !?!? Why I ought to...
(Just kidding, for the record, I'm Irish)
Anyway you said it was a good explaination, which I guess partly compensates
for that slander. :-)
I wasn't aware that the XML Rec. refers to parsers as XML processors, so it
is good that Michael Kay pointed that out.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pawson, David [SMTP:DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 12:39 PM
> To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: XSL vs. XSLT and processors vs. parsers
>
>
> Dylan Walsh (part of a good explanation)
>
> > The transformation
> > specification was
> > finished first, and was found to have uses beyond its
> > original purpose
>
> I think this one needs framing!
> Classic English understatement :-)
>
> Regards DaveP
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
