Steve Carton writes:
 > I would like to know if anyone out here has done some sort of 
 > comparative analysis of the various XSL/T engines, both from  
 > speed and from "adherence" viewpoints.

None of them meet the spec fully, except Saxon, so far as I can see.
I can blow up Xalan and Oracle fairly easily; xt, sablotron and
Microsft all have clearly defined missing features.

Sebastian Rahtz


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list