Subject: Re: feature request
From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 17:31:09 -0500
|
At 00:19 2000 05 16 +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>Eric van der Vlist writes:
> > The other form (using entities) seems to have defenders amongst the
> > SGMLers.
> >
> > Reading between the lines, do you mean it could be becoming deprecated
> > and that a way to go could be using XLink and XPointer ?
>
>I dont think you need read very far between the lines to find that
>there is a considerable band of people who would ban entities tomorrow
true (external entities, at least).
>if they could, in favour of Xlink etc.
Not XLink. XInclude (which uses XPointer).
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|