Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 01:08 AM 04/02/2000 +1200, Dan Morrison wrote:
... does this attitude mean that there can never be an XSL 2.0? XML has a version, but that may move faster or slower than the changes that will be made to XSL. I suspect that's probably the reason why the current spec requires a version="1.0" attribute to a conformant xsl:stylesheet element, as well as the xmlns declarations. ================================================================ John E. Simpson | "I was gratified to be able to answer http://www.flixml.org | promptly. I said I don't know." simpson@xxxxxxxxxxx | (Mark Twain) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
