Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> 
> Rick Geimer writes:

>  > Actually, most word-processing table editors, and even the Oasis table
>  > model, do not support table footers, which is probably why this is
>  > considered an extended feature.
> 
> XSL is targetting the sad tired old world of word-processing software?
> god help us....

Actually, all I was trying to do was point out that many, if not the
majority of formating solutions out there don't do table footers. It
would seem a little harsh to exclude all of them as possible XSL-FO
renderers because of the lack of this feature. 

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list