Dan Morrison wrote:

> On my parser I can get away with <xsl:for-each><xsl:value-of
> /></xsl-for-each>. I love shortcuts!

Looks like good old C ( while(*a--=*b++) etc ;-)), but -- 
isn't it contrary to XML spirit of explicitness? 

Regards,
Nikolai


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list