Subject: Re: XSL Theory
From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:38:17 -0600
|
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 16:25:17 -0500, you wrote:
>There is probably a sub-set of XML where the transformations should be
>provable. Any experts on graph theory on the list? Doing this kind of work
>is outside my abilities but I'd love to read a paper on this.
>
>I also think this would be of value in the ecommerce world. You wouldn't
>want a server-side transformation to accidentally charge your credit card
>twice for a book.
This is just a specific instance of a more general problem: proving
the correctness of computer programs. This is an area of active
research (do a web search on "formal methods"), but it is hard work
and there are as yet no magic bullets. The principal difficulty is
that in order to prove that a given computer program is correct, you
have to provide a precise mathematical description of exactly what it
is that the program is supposed to do. And that turns out to be
_really_ hard to do in any but the most trivial of cases.
-Steve Schafer
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: XSL Theory, (continued)
- Jon Smirl - Thu, 9 Mar 2000 16:25:17 -0500
- disco - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:30:49 -0500 (EST)
- Jon Smirl - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:39:59 -0500
- disco - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:05:09 -0500 (EST)
- Steve Schafer - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:38:17 -0600 <=
- Jon Smirl - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:22:53 -0500
- Steve Schafer - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:07:07 -0600
- Jon Smirl - Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:49:36 -0500
- Steve Schafer - Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:30:19 -0600
|
|