Christopher R. Maden wrote:
> 
> That is the Right Way to do it.

Good, so I wasn't completely making it up. I'm still unsure if it's
xml:base or xsl:base.

>  However, it most likely won't work right
> now, since that's a shiny new working draft.

Zero problemo. I've already patched the parser I'm using (4 Lines) and
it's working GREAT for me... 
I now need to get my stylesheet to pro-compile that include so it
doesn't do a new parse every page... arrg, and my caching was working so
well.

Just so long as it isn't blatently illegal when my data starts going
walkabout.

.dan.

:=====================:====================:
: Dan Morrison        : The Web Limited    :
:  http://here.is/dan :  http://web.co.nz  :
:  dman@xxxxxxxx      :  danm@xxxxxxxxx    :
:  04 384 1472        :  04 495 8250       :
:  021 115 7339       :                    :
:.....................:....................:
: If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?
:.........................................:


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list