Subject: Re: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each
From: Steve Tinney <stinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:37:11 -0500
|
> > Saxon saxon:node-set() [documented] and also saxon:nodeset()
> > [undocumented]
>
> Actually it's documented that in matching XSL function names to Java
> method names all hyphens are ignored
I suspected something of the sort. It is not guaranteed, though, that
an extension function name map directly (after mangling) to a Java
method name, is it?
Steve
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|