> Sure. I guess the main point of the post is not about this particular
> specification. I was just thinking aloud. (May be I should not have :-)

No, please do, but give a more specific example:-) string handling is
definitely one of xsls weaker points. I had been thinking more of regexp
support than full blown parser interface as you had suggested.
I just queried your xslfo example to see if you had any particular
syntax in mind that you wanted to parse.

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list