Subject: RE: The XSL-List Digest V2 #488
From: Philip Borenstein <pb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:59:50 -0500
|
Thanks. That did the trick.
I keep trying to solve most of my problems iteratively (and lately
recursively)
but it seems that the answer is always some concise path expression. Every
time I see "[ ... ]" I keep thinking it's an array.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Brown [SMTP:mbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 4:36 PM
> To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Cc: 'pb@xxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: The XSL-List Digest V2 #488
>
> > > <xsl:if at-at-least-one-TASK-has-a-non-empty-DESCRIPTION>
> > <xsl:if test="string(DESCRIPTION)">
>
> Oh, sorry, I missed the "if at-least-one ..."
> What I gave you was "if this TASK ..."
> Try this:
>
> <xsl:if test="../TASK[string(DESCRIPTION)]">
>
> It will be true if this node-set is not empty:
>
> child elements of the parent node of the current node
> that are named TASK
> and for which this is true:
> there is a not-null string value of the
> DESCRIPTION child element of the current node
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
