> No, that's the opposite of what I'm looking for. :) I want to know the level
> of conformance for the things they did include, not a list of what they
> didn't include.

Curious that Microsoft was apparently unable to devote as many resources
to developing their XSL/XPath software as Mike Kay was.  The list of
omissions is quite impressive.

 Steve


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list