Subject: RE: SAXON 5.0 is available
From: Sebastien Sahuc <ssahuc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 16:25:36 +0100
|
Ouups, forgot the links to java lobby post :
http://www.javalobby.org/servlet/News?action=displayStories&xsl=commen
t.xsl&format=full&id=510100000000125
Seb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastien Sahuc
> Sent: vendredi 3 décembre 1999 15:59
> To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: SAXON 5.0 is available
>
>
> Michael Kay wrote :
> > I still hope to get the compiler finished, though my enthusiasm
> > has been a little diminished by early performance results:
> there's no
> > point shipping it unless it runs significantly faster than the
> > terpreter.
>
> What is 'significantly faster' ? Is it at least 2x faster ?
> Indeed, with Saxon 4.5, I made some test and the compiled
> style sheet appeared to compute exactly twice as fast as the
> interpreted version, so seems to be worth enough. The style
> sheet I took as example was one you provide with SAXON 'book.xsl'.
>
> I strongly believe that compiled style sheet can blast server
> side processing. On this subject, may I ask you to read an
> excellent comment from Ray Cromwell posted in Java Lobby (if
> you haven't yet). Indeed he's raiseing some good question
> around scalability of XSL processing.
>
> Anyway thank for your hard work, it's really valuable for the
> XSL community.
>
> Sebastien
>
>
> >
> > Mike Kay
> >
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive:
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|