Subject: Re: select-distinct in for-each ?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 17:44:59 +0100 (BST)
|
> That only solves a small subset of the problem.
yes, I agree.
> If you're looking for possible XSL extensions, start with the SAXON
> group-by
Yes, there is an interesting thread on that on this list a while ago.
Actually the improvement I'd _really_ like to see in the area of sorting
is getting the sorted tree back to run templates over again. I think you
said you had an extension function to coerce result tree fragments back
to node lists didn't you?
David
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|