Nikolai Grigoriev writes:
 > to names. For some historical reasons, an element that generates
 > three adjacent area-containers in the inline-progression-direction
 > is called "a table" (or, rather, <fo:table> ;-)). If the functionality is
 > exactly what you want, does it really matter what is the label

fair point, I guess.

 > It seems to me that, for robustness' sake, we should create three
 > consecutive block-areas for left, center, and right part. You can
 > create them by placing three fo:inline-included-containers on the
 > line (one more solution ;-)) or by absolutely aligned fo:blocks
 > (yet another solution ;-)). But, won't it be simpler to use tables?

My resolve is crumbling. I can see that I may have to return to tables

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list