Kay Michael wrote:

> Another way of doing it, which solves the counting/totalling problem, avoids
> the need for xsl:item, and allows use of apply-templates, is to assign a
> node-set variable to each group in turn:

The problem with this approach is that you lose the sorting within the
group (since the XSLT datatype is node-set not node-list).

James



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list