Sorry, that was supposed to go the the XSL WG list not this one.

James Clark wrote:
> 
> The discussion in XML Plenary about whether XHTML should use 1 namespace
> URI or 3, summarized by Jon Bosak at:
> 
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-plenary/1999Aug/0091.html
> 
> leads me to wonder whether we've made the wrong decision in putting the
> version number in the XSLT namespace URI.  Would it be more in keeping
> with the Namespaces Rec to do:
> 
>   <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform"
> version="1.0">
> 
> ?  It would certainly make section 2.5 infinitely simpler. Has anybody
> implemented 2.5 yet?  I haven't and it's a bit scary.
> 
> James
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list