Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

>  > It might translate to "extremely reliable large scale transformation of
>  > documents", which sounds like a good thing, minus buzzwords.
>
> an excellent thing. perhaps then what is missing is the reasoned
> argument by the "experienced" engineers about why XSL misses the cut,
> but xmlscript makes the grade

Nor have we seen the obverse case made, at least not by way of this thread.
There's been a lot of mud-slinging and precious little substance - hardly the
handiwork of "experienced" engineers.


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list