Sebastian Rahtz
<sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 
 
 > David Tolpin writes:
 >  >  
 >  >  Anyway, FOP is the only opportunity now. Let's hope
there will
 >  > 
 > no its not, actually.
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/passivetex
 > generates PDF from XSL FO. its more fully-featured than FOP,
albeit
 > less elegant.
 > 
 
 Yes, you are right. PassiveTeX is yet another opportunity,
 although installing the right version of TeX is a bit
prohibiting for a casual user. Besides that, I didn't find
 at the site mentioned a definitive list of what is supported
 and what is not by the formatter. If it were possible to check

 the program against the tests published at
 
 http://www.renderx.com/Demo/index.html
 
 it would help a lot to estimate it's full-featuredness.
 Unfortunately, the only xsl fo available as an example of
PassiveTeX's functionality is not an XSL FO, since it contains
 'custom' elements (fotex:bookmark).
 
 David Tolpin
-------------------------------------
Register now at http://hragir.aua.am/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list