Kay Michael writes:
 > >   xmlns:msxsl='http://microsoft.com/XSL/Transform/1.0'
 > 
 > and then use <msxsl:stylesheet>, <msxsl:template> etc if you wanted to
 > highlight the fact, but that's up to you. Certainly, w3c don't have a
 > monopoly on the "xsl" namespace prefix, only on the namespace URL.

And when I do <xsl:import href="mslib/useful.xsl"/>, the application
is supposed to take care of all the details? One could, theoretically, 
work in a mixture of the two languages?

when we come to the autumn, and the W3C XSL is out, will this be the
Vietnam of W3C?

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list