As I mentioned on this list before, it would be nice to mention that the DTD for
XSL-FO is an SGML DTD, not an XML DTD.

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx

Stephen Deach wrote:

> The XSL working group is soliciting comments from the xsl-list to improve
> the readability and understandability of formatting object and property
> descriptions in the April draft ( http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xsl-19990421 ).
>
> We are seeking comments on the wording and organization of the document,
> locations where a diagram or example is necessary or would be extremely
> helpful, and any missing or incomplete descriptions, ambiguities, vagueness,
> apparent contradictions, and any other *concrete* issues.
>
> In short, we are seeking suggestions that would improve the usefulness of
> the document.
>
> Please respond within the next 2 weeks to "RE: XSL-WG solicits comments on
> FO Draft" on "xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>   Stephen Deach                            |  Sr Computer Scientist
>   408-536-6521 (office)                    |  Adobe Systems Inc.
>   408-537-4214 (fax)                       |  Mail Stop E15-420
>   sdeach@xxxxxxxxx                         |  345 Park Ave
>                                            |  San Jose, CA 95110-2704
>                                            |  USA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list