> This bring up an interesting point.  Is there an advantage to
> saving the HTML file and delivering a static version to a
> browser rather than a dynamic version delivered on the fly
> using XSL and, say IE5 (just for an example.)
>
> I've always been under the impressiion that the dynamic
> delivery is preferable from a management standpoint - could I
> be wrong here?

It depends on the situation.  You can do both by inserting a cache
management layer.  If neither the source document nor the XSL changed, just
send back the cached HTML file.

Don


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list