> Sorry if this is a bit off-topic but did anyone see this guys comments
> about XSL?  I felt anyone investing time and effort into XSL may have
> something to say about this.

Since his examples show that he is bashing an imaginary language which is a
very distant cousin of XSL, it hardly seems worth the trouble.
Extraordinary, though, that someone proposing an alternative approach should
display his ignorance in such a manner.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list