Subject: Relative URLs in XT and LotusXSL
From: "Adrian Boyko" <Adrian_Boyko@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:34:28 -0700
|
I'm confused by the treatment of relative URLs in both XT and LotusXSL.
I'm making heavy use of xsl:import in my stylesheets, and have been using
relative URLs in import's href attribute. E.g. <xsl:import
href="common.xsl"/>. Given this pretty straight-forward relative URL, I
get the following strange when processors try to process it:
1: When I process these stylesheets using xt.exe, the relative URL is
resolved as expected. It's resolved w.r.t. the URL of the importing
stylesheet.
2: When I use LotusXSL at the command line, the relative URL is resolved
w.r.t. the current working directory.
3: When I (more or less) cut-and-paste the contents of XT's Driver.main()
into my own servlet, I get a MalformedURLException with message "no
protocol".
Why am I seeing so many different results for resolution of relative URLs?
Any ideas?
Adrian Boyko
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|