Subject: RE: Leventhal's challenge misses the point
From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:22:47 +0200
|
I am a non-programmer who had quite an easy time with XSL. You can do a
usability study on me if you like :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Miles Sabin [mailto:msabin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 1999 1:32 PM
To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: Nathan Langley
Subject: RE: Leventhal's challenge misses the point
Andrew M. Greene wrote,
> Miles Sabin wrote,
> > It's not that I doubt the _intelligence_ of (most
> > importantly) graphic designers, I just doubt that
> > they'll have either the time or the inclination to
> > learn how to be programmers.
>
> But isn't that the whole point? With XSL (or a similar
> approach) they don't have to learn procedural
> programming.
<snip/>
Do you have any evidence to support the claim that non-
programmer designers will have an easier time with
declarative languages than with imperative ones? The
HCI person sitting next to me wants to see the usability
studies ...
Cheers,
Miles
--
Miles Sabin Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230 London, W6 0LJ
msabin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx England
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Linda van den Brink - Fri, 28 May 1999 14:13:07 +0200
Linda van den Brink - Fri, 28 May 1999 14:22:47 +0200 <=
Miles Sabin - Fri, 28 May 1999 14:14:51 +0100
|
|