Subject: Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 18:30:57 +0100 (BST)
|
> I've already found it necessary to pre-process my XML so that it makes good XSL
> food,
Is it possible to say the kind of pre-processing that you found
necessary, so that people can think about possible XSL extensions
(Short of allowing arbitrary calls to alternative languages)
that would solve the problem?
David
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
