>This seems to be rather overstating things to me.  The fact that the two
>languages are defined in one spec doesn't affect the languages
>themselves one iota.  The specifications of the two languages are
>cleanly separated: the transformation language is in section 2 and the
>formatting DTD is in section 3. Whether or not you make separate
>physical documents out of the two sections doesn't seem a big deal to
>me.


James,

I have had the misfortune of being an entrepreneur as well as a developer
for the past 18 years which means I had to worry about the color of the box
as much as what goes into it.  Based on my experience, it matters a great
deal whether one say "our product supports XSL fully" or "our product
supports half of XSL".  I will bet you my wallet that it does [note that I
did not bet the content <g>].

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list