I am impressed!  I mean it's not exactly what is being looked for
but it I think it is actually better.  I like it.

BTW Love the content ;]
Thanks
Trev


>Hi.
>
>Yes is does, in that you can quite happily produce dHTML from XML. If your
>XML nicely expresses you tree well, all the better.
>
>It's not a tree, but I produced collapsable menus from XML, which is just a
>hop-skip-and-a-jump from a tree view. You can take a look this at...
>
>http://www.guy-murphy.easynet.co.uk/shakespeare/
>
>What you have to keep in mind is that the functionality isn't that of XSL
>as such but the dHTML that you are producing. All XSL is doing for you in
>this instance is transforming the XML into dHTML.
>
>Good luck
>     Guy.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list