Subject: Re: RTF specs
From: jeremy@xxxxxxxxx (Jeremy H. Griffith)
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 21:23:23 GMT
|
On Mon, 01 Feb 1999 21:39:23 +0100, Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> wrote:
>Thanks. So, all RTF readers will be able to import documents conforming
>to this spec.
Sorry, no. While RTF's design seems intended to permit this, most
reader implementations (such as the MS WinHelp compiler) do not
operate in a compliant manner. WordPerfect is especially nasty.
Even MS Word, the "reference implementation", is inconsistent.
>My initial objection - which was just a passing comment
>anyway - was based on the impression that the RTF emitted by current
>applications changed with new software releases - a moving target.
This is true. It's also a very poorly documented moving target.
The docs *look* comprehensive at first glance, but when you actually
proceed to implementation of anything non-trivial, you quickly find
that the "language" is badly underspecified. You need to do a lot
of testing, with MS Word, to find just the right constructions.
But then, it is a "standard" with no real standards group behind
it, only MS...
-- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc.
(jeremy@xxxxxxxxx) http://www.omsys.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|