Subject: RE: CSS and XSL
From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:35:36 -0500
|
Hi Didier,
> > Kind of like [ Netscapisms snipped ]
> > except new and improved, because it's now XML?
> I like it! And you know, is is more economical for an interpreter
> implementer because now, only a XML parser is required. Also, an other gain
> is on memory economy (from the human point of view - just use XML rules).
> This also, has other more structural advantages like defining objects and
> property sets with the same syntax (and reduce the schizoid tendencies of
> actual HTML+CSS). Yes, I like it!
My rhetorical question was sort of tongue-in-cheek. :) There were good reasons
for the "schizoid" nature of *ML+CSS. I question whether reversion to an
"improved", well-formed Tag Soup is progress.
/Jelks
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|