HI Joe,

Thanx for your input, I'll try to follow your advise in my future messages.

Regards
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netfolder.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 29, 1999 10:25 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Announcement


It's an interesting debate, but could I _please_ ask folks to either use
shorter quotes from the previous discusison or to make them more visually
distinct (indented, or at least >>> prefixed)? It's a real pain trying to
separate out the new discussion from the thread leading up to it.

(I have a personal near-religious belief that the extensive-quote-and-reply
style of discussion tends to be more prone to defensiveness and less
successful in actually communicating than most of the alternatives, and
would rather see the quotes _drastically_ trimmed on the assumption that
anyone who wants to see the prior context can hit the archive. But I
recognize that I'm in the minority on this one.)

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list