Subject: Re: xt + lotusxsl
From: Nantapon Chaimunkong <b38npc@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:00:07 +0700 (GMT)
|
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 Scott_Boag/CAM/Lotus@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > (1) Both xt and lotusxsl seems to implements some kind of specificity. What
> > rule do they use from previous draft? Is priority attribute come first?
>
> No, they don't implement specificity. Document order and the priority attribute
> are the tie-breaking conflict resolution mechanism for the moment. LotusXSL
> warns you about any conflicts that will be resolved using document order. These
> can always be 'fixed' using the priority attribute.
Ah, I see. You choose the last one. Can you tell me why you(jclark or
scott) choose the last one not the first one?
After I implements priority, my processor also choose the last one because
of the sorting algorithm. :P
> I'm not sure I grocked your question correctly. The default namespace of the
> stylesheet is not used in the patterns. Does this help?
>
Yes, a lot.
Please correct me.
Nantapol
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|