Paul Prescod wrote:

> If you need
> transformation, then you don't really have any choice about whether to use
> CSS or XSL and there is also no competition. CSS can't even handle a
> simple cross-reference (nor should it be extended to! It's good at what it
> does)

	False. You are mixing two things : CSS and other concepts
using CSS general syntax.  We (Electricité de France) modify HTML and
XML fragments using a transformation language based on CSS syntax. Not
CSS, a different spec.

> According to our own informal survey, these technologies are not in
> contention, direct or otherwise. They are complementary.

	I already gave my opinion on the very large panelization of this
survey...

</Daniel>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list