Subject: Re: xsl:comment and xsl:pi containing template elements?
From: Ray Cromwell <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 19:06:22 -0500 (EST)
|
>
> BTW, thank you XSL designers for having the forethought not to bloat XSL
> with an embedded scripting solution. My faith in XSL has been
> rekindled. Keep up the good work.
I hope that either the W3C proposes a separate language that does include
the ability to "drop out" to ECMAScript+DOM on a pattern match, OR,
that the industry has the courage not to introduce conflicting
extensions that do this, because six months to a year from now,
I doubt that will be a single widely used commercial XSL parser
that DOESN'T have a Java or Script hook in it.
I'm disappointed that this draft doesn't even mention the issue of
scripting.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
