Ed Nixon <ed.nixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>XSL, we can only hope will be able to survive the storms and stresses of
the
>development process with a similar, if somewhat less comprehensive, set of
>cleanly integrated but differentiated features. With all due respect for
>surveys and questionnaires, it's not clear to me what the purpose or
benefit
>will be other than to add more complications to what must be already a
highly
>complicated, read: politicized, process. I'd feel much most positive about
r
>esponding to something even semi-official from the Working Group. It's high
>time for a new draft, note, or whatever.


Does this mean I can add you with a "yes" answer for question #1 - "The W3
organization should address the issue" ? :-)

Oren.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list