Subject: Re: Stepping back, part two...
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:58:32 +0000 (GMT)
|
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> It comes as a great suprise to me that XSL is a print and not Web driven
> style language, and if this is the W3Cs stated intent, they'd do well to
> let the Web development community know.
>
I am very puzzled as to why you want to make this distinction. we have
quite enough ghettos already without "Web vs print" becoming a
battle. do you *like* conflict? XSL is a style language for XML, isnt
it? what more do you need to say? do you think XML's only is for the Web?
Sebastian Rahtz
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- RE: Stepping back, part two..., (continued)
- Pawson, David - Fri, 27 Nov 1998 11:08:18 -0000
- Guy_Murphy - Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:01:01 +0000
- Guy_Murphy - Mon, 30 Nov 1998 10:21:30 +0000
- Sebastian Rahtz - Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:58:32 +0000 (GMT) <=
- Pawson, David - Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:37:42 -0000
- Guy_Murphy - Mon, 30 Nov 1998 14:58:40 +0000
|
|