>I'm confused - are we talking about the "pattern-pi-target" issue?

No, we're talking about the same thing, patterns that can operate on PI's.
Being able to recognize and operate on PIs in XSL should be a trivial
extension, and could be a useful one.

My comment about "portable nonportable" was a drastic shorthand for the
fact that the intent of PI's is to provide a portable way of expressing
things in XML that are _not_ portable in the sense that they are meaningful
only to an individual tool.
______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list