Subject: Re: XSL Trans
From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:35:41 +0800
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>I wonder if the XSL transformation language should be split off and
>designed separately from the formatting objects language. It could be
>called XTrans or something.
Agreed. And excellent reasons and addressing of the issues included.
Could the "tree addressing language" also be split off as Paul and I have
suggested here before?
James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia ( http://www.schema.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: XSL Trans, (continued)
- clilley - Wed, 30 Sep 1998 07:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
- Ed Nixon - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
- Tony Stewart - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
- James Tauber - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 23:37:51 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Francois Belanger - Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
|
|