[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: XSL Trans
From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:35:41 +0800
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>I wonder if the XSL transformation language should be split off and
>designed separately from the formatting objects language. It could be
>called XTrans or something.

Agreed. And excellent reasons and addressing of the issues included.
Could the "tree addressing language" also be split off as Paul and I have
suggested here before?

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx      http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network             ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School                  ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia                ( http://www.schema.net/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • Re: XSL Trans, (continued)
        • clilley - Wed, 30 Sep 1998 07:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
    • Ed Nixon - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
    • Tony Stewart - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
    • James Tauber - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 23:37:51 -0400 (EDT) <=
    • Francois Belanger - Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member