Subject: Re: XSL Trans
From: Stefan Trcek <stefan_trcek@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 10:24:49 +0200
|
Paul Prescod wrote:
>
> I wonder if the XSL transformation language should be split off and
> designed separately from the formatting objects language. It could be
> called XTrans or something.
Good idea! This would get me back to XSL.
I started with XSL (the former 24 pages spec), because it was
declarative and simple. I stopped it, because it focused in a
shortsighted way to formatting only (and thus the tools do so too).
This new approach can draw the line between data transformation
(general) and formatting (one special backend feeding the HTML and
RTF processors).
--
Stefan Trcek
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
- XSL Trans
- Paul Prescod - Sun, 20 Sep 1998 15:58:12 -0400 (EDT)
- Stefan Trcek - Mon, 21 Sep 1998 04:26:52 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Andrew Bunner - Mon, 21 Sep 1998 14:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Dave Peterson - Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:53:57 -0400 (EDT)
- clilley - Sun, 27 Sep 1998 12:53:25 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Cart
