[initial question: do we call FOs: formatting objects or flow objects?]

Has any consideration been given to including some sort of tree control FO?
It doesn't really work on paper, but I can imagine that online there would
be a number of element types that would best be expressed as a tree control.

<!ELEMENT fo:tree (fo:treenode+)>
<!ELEMENT fo:treenode %foAllSub;)>

with fo:treenode having attributes relating to node icon, collapsibility,
etc.

What do people think?

James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx
Perth, Western Australia



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list