Subject: Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can't we have both ?
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 09:48:59 +1000
|
At 01:31 20/08/1998 , you wrote:
| You would write a layer that will plug in the existing SAX or DOM
| interface of your XML parser, expand the
| short form if detected and return, again through SAX or DOM, the
| expanded XML.
|
| This would need to be written only once and might work with any SAX/DOM
| XML parser.
Written once in what programming language?
Would this single piece of code be useable in: DOS/Windows 3.11/Window 95/
Windows NT/all Unix flavours/mainframes/Macs/C/C++/Pascal/Ada/Java/Visual
Basic/...
XML is a standard document format.
It is _not_ a standard set of tools, however common SAX/DOM may end
up being.
J
-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|