Subject: Re: `High-level' format specifications with XSL?
From: Paul Grosso <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 11:18:02 -0400
|
At 06:43 1998 07 09 -0400, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
>Obviously, my rule was pretty much the same as yours, and xslj choked
>on it, whereas MSXSL seems to be happy with it.
>
>Therefore the question is: which of the two implementations (if any)
>behave conforming to the standard-to-be?
Neither. How could they be--the standard-to-be isn't yet.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
