Subject: Re: Interactive XML
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 16:41:45 +0100
|
Paul Prescod writes:
> same standard library. Typically the ECMAScript version will be more
> readable to the typical programmer because it uses a more conventional
> syntax and less constrained ("side-effect-free") data model.
"typical", "conventional"? is the next century to remain dominated by
those who learnt their computing in the 1970s?
sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|