Subject: RE: Fw: Signing of XSL scripts
From: Boris Moore <Boris.Moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 10:09:10 +0200
|
John Dreystadt:
> I can easily imagine someone wanting to implement an escape to an
> external application for complex processing. How about queries to an
> external database?
The host application for XSL will be the XSL processor. I understand
that conformant XSL processors will implement a subset of standard
ECMAScript together with some XSL specific built-in functions, giving
no more access to the local system than ECMAScript in an HTML
page. (Possibly less).
Perhaps future XSL processors will be hosted by other applications, not
only by browsers, (or by documents themselves hosted by browsers).
But in that case too, I believe the XSL processor will at best have access
to its hosting application, which itself will be subject to its own specific
security model.
A Java applet, for example, would not therefore be able to use XSL to
gain any additional access to the local system...
Boris Moore
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|
Paul Prescod - Fri, 29 May 1998 10:05:18 -0400 (EDT)
Paul Prescod - Fri, 29 May 1998 10:05:32 -0400 (EDT)
Boris Moore - Sat, 30 May 1998 04:18:38 -0400 (EDT) <=
Martin Bryan - Sat, 30 May 1998 04:28:17 -0400 (EDT)
|
|