[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
  • To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 22:02:01 +0000

Hi Folks,

In a previous post I asked: 

What stage should the entity &amp; be converted to &?
(a)	Lexical analysis stage
(b)	Syntax analysis stage
(c)	Semantic analysis stage

One person suggested that entities can be converted even before the lexical analysis stage, in a preprocessor stage -- analogous to the way a C preprocessor replaces macro definitions.

Question: Are there any problems with converting all entities in a preprocessor stage?

See answer below .........














Answer: If you were to convert all entities, then that would result in converting this:

	<![CDATA[&amp;]]>

to this:

	<![CDATA[&]]>

And that would be incorrect.

Thanks to Matt Timmermans for pointing this out to me.

/Roger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member