[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Pete Cordell <pete++xmldev@c...>
  • To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, Mukul Gandhi <mukulg@s...>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 12:29:20 +0000

On 11/03/2022 08:48, Michael Kay wrote:
Well, I would say that XSD is indeed a "formal computer language", but not a "programming language"; I don't think you can describe something as a programming language unless it is Turing-complete.

I don't know of any universally accepted categorisation scheme for formal computer languages, and without such a scheme you can't say where a particular language fits; but it's certainly reasonable to describe XSD as a constraint specification language or as a data definition language (if indeed those two categories are distinct).
A related perma-topic is "Is HTML a programming language?"

I'm in the "No, because it is not Turing-complete" camp (for example, it has no conditionals) but it does instruct a computer to do things and so others say it is.

I'd say if "programming language" was a spectrum, HTML would be more of a programming language than XSD.

To add more confusion, for most programming languages such as C++ and Java, it's very specific what the language tells the computer to do.

With XSD, the XSD can be used in many ways by a computer. Does that suggest it is "something else"?

Pete.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Read & write XML in C++, http://www.xml2cpp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member